On Sunday 31 July 2005 06:44, Ingo Molnar wrote: >* Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> because end_buffer_async_read/write use bit_spin_(un)lock and I do >> not know how those interact with -RT. > >bit_spin_lock is preemptible too - but it's not a too nice > construct. What seems to have happened in your trace is that > local_irq_disable() was used too in combination with bit-spinlocks, > and a spinlock was taken from within it. The best fix would be to > get rid of bit-spinlocks ... > > Ingo
And that refuses to build here, mode 4 for 52-05: fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:125: error: `SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED' undeclared here (not in a function) make[2]: *** [fs/nfsd/nfs4state.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [fs/nfsd] Error 2 make: *** [fs] Error 2 >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
