On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:31:54PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:41:28 +0200 > Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> wrote: > > larger value. When the maximum is reached in normal time accumulation, > > the clock will be stepped back by one week. > > Which itself is open to exploits and dirty tricks and causes bizarre > problems.
Any examples? I think it shouldn't be any worse than having system clock with incorrect time and making a backward step, which is a well understood problem. > IMHO it doesn't actually improve the situation. Do you have a 32-bit system for testing? Try "date -s @2147483600", wait one minute and see if it's not worth preventing. I think the power consumption alone is worth it. If there is some widely used application/service in which the overflow triggers an infinite loop making requests to a network service, maybe it could prevent a DDoS attack. -- Miroslav Lichvar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/