When Al Viro saw the ub.c, he observed that it was a proof positive of
Linus not reading patches anymore: names like fo_ob_ar_ba_2 used to
cause serious fireworks. In my defence, any good scheme can be pushed
to the realm of absurd if pushed far enough.
Signed-off-by: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4-4seg/drivers/block/ub.c 2005-07-30 22:19:55.000000000
-0700
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-lem/drivers/block/ub.c 2005-07-29 22:42:00.000000000
-0700
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ struct ub_dev {
/*
*/
static void ub_cleanup(struct ub_dev *sc);
-static int ub_bd_rq_fn_1(struct ub_lun *lun, struct request *rq);
+static int ub_request_fn_1(struct ub_lun *lun, struct request *rq);
static int ub_cmd_build_block(struct ub_dev *sc, struct ub_lun *lun,
struct ub_scsi_cmd *cmd, struct request *rq);
static void ub_scsi_build_block(struct ub_lun *lun,
@@ -767,20 +768,20 @@ static struct ub_scsi_cmd *ub_cmdq_pop(s
* The request function is our main entry point
*/
-static void ub_bd_rq_fn(request_queue_t *q)
+static void ub_request_fn(request_queue_t *q)
{
struct ub_lun *lun = q->queuedata;
struct request *rq;
while ((rq = elv_next_request(q)) != NULL) {
- if (ub_bd_rq_fn_1(lun, rq) != 0) {
+ if (ub_request_fn_1(lun, rq) != 0) {
blk_stop_queue(q);
break;
}
}
}
-static int ub_bd_rq_fn_1(struct ub_lun *lun, struct request *rq)
+static int ub_request_fn_1(struct ub_lun *lun, struct request *rq)
{
struct ub_dev *sc = lun->udev;
struct ub_scsi_cmd *cmd;
@@ -2356,7 +2357,7 @@ static int ub_probe_lun(struct ub_dev *s
disk->driverfs_dev = &sc->intf->dev; /* XXX Many to one ok? */
rc = -ENOMEM;
- if ((q = blk_init_queue(ub_bd_rq_fn, &sc->lock)) == NULL)
+ if ((q = blk_init_queue(ub_request_fn, &sc->lock)) == NULL)
goto err_blkqinit;
disk->queue = q;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
