On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:44:06AM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> On 09/04/15 15:57, Mark Salter wrote:
> > Currently in validate_group(), there is a static initializer
> > for fake_pmu.used_mask which is based on CPU_BITS_NONE but
> > the used_mask array size is based on CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS.
> > CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS is not based on NR_CPUS, so CPU_BITS_NONE
> > is not correct and will cause a build failure if NR_CPUS
> > is set high enough to make CPU_BITS_NONE larger than used_mask.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msal...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> > index 84fd660..759e41c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> > @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
> > * Initialise the fake PMU. We only need to populate the
> > * used_mask for the purposes of validation.
> > */
> > - .used_mask = CPU_BITS_NONE,
> > + .used_mask = { 0 },
> > };
> >
> > if (!validate_event(&fake_pmu, leader))
> >
> I have a series of patches to add CCI-500 PMU, targeting 4.2, which
> changes the used_mask to a pointer and changes it to depend on the
> number of counters available on the CCI PMU. I will post it in very
> soon here, which could make this patch obsolete. Let me know if you
> don't mind getting this sorted out through my series. I am fine either way.
I'd rather have the fix in for 4.1 and then have your CCI-500 patches based
on that.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
