> If user code programs fs != 0 and fsbase != whatever is implied by fs
> and the GDT/LDT, what happens? 

We load the value from the LDT/GDT.

> There's already a minor buglet in that
> area without wrfsbase, but fixing it would be a big performance hit
> because we don't have rdfsbase and rdgsbase to read the state
> efficiently.  (Specifically, if we have gs == 0, gsbase == 0, but
> *saved* gsbase != 0, then we corrupt gsbase on context switch.)
> 
> But, with the new instructions, we can do it simply, efficiently, and
> correctly in all cases.  Let's do so.

We would need an instruction to write the index without changing the base.
That's not what the new instructions do.

-Andi

-- 
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to