Am 02.04.2015 um 21:19 schrieb Andrea Scian:
> Il 02/04/2015 19:54, Richard Weinberger ha scritto:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Am 02.04.2015 um 19:34 schrieb Andrea Scian:
>>> Richard,
>>>
>>> Il 29/03/2015 14:13, Richard Weinberger ha scritto:
>>>> + mutex_lock(&ubi->buf_mutex);
>>>> + err = ubi_io_read(ubi, ubi->peb_buf, e->pnum, 0, ubi->peb_size);
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&ubi->buf_mutex);
>>>> + if (err == UBI_IO_BITFLIPS) {
>>>> + dbg_wl("found bitflips in PEB %d", e->pnum);
>>>> + spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
>>>> +
>>> IIUC you trigger the action as soon as you have a bitflip error, is this
>>> correct?
>> I trigger it as soon UBI sees the bitflip. This depends on the configured MTD
>> bitflip_threshold.
>
> ops.. I confused UBI bitflip error with MTD bitflip error ;-)
> thanks for point this out and help me understanding the code
>
> now it's clear and it sounds good to me
Is this an implicit Reviewed-by? :)
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
