On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke wrote:
> On 04/06/2015 07:59 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> In this case we are not actually boosting the idle_task priority, which
> should be OK.  But the warning could be very overwhelming on some
> platforms. TO keep the warning, I decided not to boots priority.  Please
> let me know if you have any suggestion.

Don't even try to get this working. Taking the lock in idle/interrupt
context is just plain wrong.

The proper solution is to get rid of the locking requirement and that
needs some thought on the timer wheel code.

Thanks,

        tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to