On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 01:28:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Can't we send all these kind of patches through the trivial tree? > Don't get me wrong, if you are fine with these patches that's you decision. > But other maintainers might think they have to take these patches and > get overloaded. I'm thinking of drivers maintainers that can only work > one or two hours per week on Linux. > Not everyone works full time on it like you. > > I propose to send all this stuff though the trivial tree such that maintainers > of other subsystems have less workload and newbies (which are supposed > to send such patches) know which tree they have to work against. > Let's have to well defined and ordered. :-)
As per the other branch of this tree; an emphatic NO to that. The trivial tree is not a backdoor to bypass maintainers. Actual code changes do not get to go through any tree but the maintainer tree unless explicitly ACKed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
