On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 05:21 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 28/03/2015 at 23:09:35 +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote :
> > __rtc_read_time logs should be debug logs instead of error logs.
> > 
> > For example, when the RTC clock is not set, it's not really useful
> > to print a kernel error log every time someone tries to read the clock:
> > 
> >     ~ # hwclock -r
> >     [  604.508263] rtc rtc0: read_time: fail to read
> >     hwclock: RTC_RD_TIME: Invalid argument
> > 
> > If there's a real error, it's likely that lower level or higher level
> > code will tell it anyway. Make these logs debug logs, and also print
> > the error code for the read failure.
> > 
> 
> That actually may be the only error message printed for some failures.
> Some RTCs don't print anything in case of error in their .read_time()
> and there are in-kernel users of rtc_read_time that simply bail out
> without printing anything or have a trace that is already at the debug
> level.
> 
> I would agree that this would need a better harmonization and I guess we
> can do that for now. I'll try to fix the in-kernel cases.

Maybe these should use dev_err_once().

> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/interface.c b/drivers/rtc/interface.c
[]
> > @@ -31,13 +31,14 @@ static int __rtc_read_time(struct rtc_device *rtc, 
> > struct rtc_time *tm)
> >             memset(tm, 0, sizeof(struct rtc_time));
> >             err = rtc->ops->read_time(rtc->dev.parent, tm);
> >             if (err < 0) {
> > -                   dev_err(&rtc->dev, "read_time: fail to read\n");
> > +                   dev_dbg(&rtc->dev, "read_time: fail to read: %d\n",
> > +                           err);
> >                     return err;
> >             }
> >  
> >             err = rtc_valid_tm(tm);
> >             if (err < 0)
> > -                   dev_err(&rtc->dev, "read_time: rtc_time isn't valid\n");
> > +                   dev_dbg(&rtc->dev, "read_time: rtc_time isn't valid\n");
> >     }
> >     return err;
> >  }



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to