On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 10:28 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:26:03AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:44 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:13:33PM -0400, David Ahern wrote:
> > > > Before spending too much time formalizing this I wanted to see if you
> > > > guys
> > > > would entertain the idea of making this info available via debugfs. It
> > > > does
> > > > move the existing sched_features file to sched/features -- not sure how
> > > > acceptable it is to move files in debugfs.
> > >
> > > There also already is a /proc/sys/kernel/sched_domain/ sysctl thing that
> > > has much of the stuff in.
> > >
> > > I'm not opposed to a debugfs thing, but only if we can take the sysctl
> > > thing out.
> >
> > Ew, I can see the regression reports now. That stuff has long roots.
>
> I didn't say we could take it out, I only said it would maybe be nice to
> be able to :-) But yah. It'll cause some pain if we do :/
I think it would be a good thing if we can get away with it, but I also
think you could safely bet your life that somebody will squeak.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
