On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 07:29:36AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Header moved from linux/pci_ids.h to uapi/linux/pci_ids.h, > > use the new header directly so we can drop > > the wrapper in include/linux/pci_ids.h. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c > > index 76164e1..3b52a56 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c > > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ > > #include <linux/init.h> > > #include <linux/memblock.h> > > #include <linux/mmzone.h> > > -#include <linux/pci_ids.h> > > +#include <uapi/linux/pci_ids.h> > > #include <linux/pci.h> > > #include <linux/bitops.h> > > #include <linux/suspend.h> > > -- > > MST > > > > NAK, it's absolutely ridiculous to send a 86 patches series for a > trivial change like this! > > Just do the rename in a single patch and avoid the churn. Even if > there are conflicts, they are utmost trivial to fix up. > > In fact the usual way to do such renames is to wait until the end of > -rc1, auto-generate it and send Linus the core patch with the trivial > renames straight away. > > Thanks, > > Ingo
Unfortunately, vger mailing lists reject any email with more than 2k of email headers. This means if I do what you suggest I can't Cc all maintainers for all affected files. I could just Cc all mailing lists I guess, but I really wasn't sure about some parts of the change, deferring it until end of -rc1 wouldn't be appropriate in this case, would it? -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
