On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:10 +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > On 03/20/2015 03:04 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:24 +0530, bk rakesh wrote: > >> Adding few more information regarding the setup which i had created to > >> test the vt-d posted interrupts for assigned devices, > >> > >> Hardware used for evaluating vt-posted interrupts > >> cpu "E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz" and "S2600CP server board" > >> > >> I had used kernel-3.18 patched with "KVM-VFIO IRQ forward > >> control(posted by eric.au...@linaro.org)", > > > > IRQ forwarding in an ARM technology for handling level triggered > > interrupts, not Intel, not even x86. > > Hi Alex, > > Feng's series relies on few pacth files in "KVM-VFIO IRQ forward > control", basically for KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE group introduction in > KVM-VFIO. This explains why you find some references to that patch here > I guess.
Ah yes, makes sense. Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
