On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:36:36 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:58:33 -0700 > Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > OK. This code is basically required to support perf/ftrace and > > modules, yes? Presumably small and space-constrained systems aren't > > using either, so they don't take the hit. > > > > However CONFIG_MODULES systems which aren't using perf/ftrace _do_ take > > a hit. How many systems are we talking here? All non-x86? > > Compromise... (Totally untested) > > ... > > +config RBTREE_LATCH_INLINE > + def_bool y > + depends on PERF_EVENTS || TRACING Should this be PERF_EVENTS, or PERF_EVENTS_NMI? Could we just keep the old __module_address() for these configs? It's only 10 lines.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
