On 19 March 2015 at 08:23, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org> writes: > >> I forgot to mention in my previous email... I think the hierarchy of >> our respective tracing module along with the generic-stm probably >> needs a review. >> >> Currently we have drivers/coresight, drivers/intel_th and drivers/stm. >> >> To me it doesn't scale - what happens when other architectures come >> out with their own hw tracing technologies? >> >> I suggest we move everything under drivers/hwtracing and as such have: >> >> drivers/hwtracing >> drivers/hwtracing/intel_ht >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight >> drivers/hwtracing/stm >> >> That way other architectures can add drivers for their own hw tracing >> technology without further polluting the drivers/ directory and >> concentrating everything in the same area. What's your view on that? > > I wanted to suggest something similar, actually, if you don't mind > moving drivers/coresight, then let's do it.
That's a deal - my next patchset will reflect that new organisation. > > Regards, > -- > Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
