From: Lukasz Skalski <l.skal...@samsung.com>

The member field is called 'cookie_reply', fix the documentation which
incorrectly used 'reply_cookie'.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Skalski <l.skal...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com>
---
Hi Greg

This is a leftover from the out-of-tree kdbus repository. It was applied after
v3, so it was never included in the kdbus branch. I've rebased it on your branch
now.

Thanks
David

 Documentation/kdbus/kdbus.message.xml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/kdbus/kdbus.message.xml 
b/Documentation/kdbus/kdbus.message.xml
index c25000d..5e7c7a3 100644
--- a/Documentation/kdbus/kdbus.message.xml
+++ b/Documentation/kdbus/kdbus.message.xml
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ struct kdbus_msg {
                   For a message to be accepted as reply, it must be a direct
                   message to the original sender (not a broadcast and not a
                   signal message), and its
-                  <varname>kdbus_msg.reply_cookie</varname> must match the
+                  <varname>kdbus_msg.cookie_reply</varname> must match the
                   previous message's <varname>kdbus_msg.cookie</varname>.
                 </para><para>
                   Expected replies also temporarily open the policy of the
-- 
2.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to