On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:49:59 +0200 Guillaume Chazarain wrote: > 2005/7/21, Voluspa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > 2h48m at 100 HZ > > 2h48m at 250 HZ > > 2h47m at 1000 HZ > > Now, what would be interesting is to see if the lack of differences > comes from the fact that the processor has enough time to sleep, > not enough time, or simply it does not matter. > > That is, is it a best case or a worst case ?
Those words swished above my head. I'd need serious hand-holding to conduct any further (meaningful) tests. > > > #!/bin/sh > > touch time-hz-start > > while (true) do > > touch time-hz-end > > sleep 1m > > done > > Why this ? > Why not simply nothing ? > A computer can be idle for more than 1 minute ;-) I had other things to do than sit with a stopwatch in my hand staring at a black screen :-) Also, 1 minute is a resonable comparison level. Mvh Mats Johannesson -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
