On 03/11/2015 11:57 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:40:20AM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> On 03/08/2015 08:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >> > You mean _do_enable(), not _enable() here. It's not really a leftover > >> No, I meant _enable() here. What I said is that _enable() is checking >> if -EINVAL was returned by _is_enabled(): > > Then we have an abstraction problem if we're trying to do things in > plain _enable() - _do_enable() is supposed to be hiding all this stuff. >
Agreed. Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
