On 2005-07-20T09:55:31, "Walker, Bruce J (HP-Labs)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like Lars, I too was under the wrong impression about this configfs
> "nodemanager" kernel component. Our discussions in the cluster
> meeting Monday and Tuesday were assuming it was a general service that
> other kernel components could/would utilize and possibly also
> something that could send uevents to non-kernel components wanting a
> std. way to see membership information/events.
Let me clarify that this was something we briefly touched on in
Walldorf: The node manager would (re-)export the current data via sysfs
(which would result in uevents being sent, too), and not something we
dreamed up just Monday ;-)
> As to kernel components without corresponding user-level "managers",
> look no farther than OpenSSI. Our hope was that we could adapt to a
> user-land membership service and this interface thru configfs would
> drive all our kernel subsystems.
Well, node manager still can provide you the input as to which nodes are
configured, which in a way translates to "membership". The thing it
doesn't seem to provide yet is the supsend/modify/resume cycle which for
example the RHAT DLM seems to require.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
