On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:42:22PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 01:05:06PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > kbuild test robot reported that for microblaze-allyesconfig
> > chan_to_field() and lynxfb_ops_set_par() were not defined. These two
> > functions were defined under CONFIG_PM, so for any archtecture if
> > CONFIG_PM is not defined we will have this error.
> > 
> > while moving the lynxfb_suspend() function some very obvious
> > checkpatch errors, like space after comma, space after if, space
> > before opening brace, were taken care of.
> 
> I have a script to review patches moving functions around but these
> white space changes break my script so I have to review it by hand.
> Sucks.

oops . sorry ..
> 
> >  static int lynxfb_ops_set_par(struct fb_info * info)
<snip>
> >  static inline unsigned int chan_to_field(unsigned int chan,struct 
> > fb_bitfield * bf)
> >  {
> >     chan &= 0xffff;
> 
> These white space changes are not related.
if you want i can break it into multiple patches, so that reviewing can be easy 
and your script will not break :) .
Actually I thought, since this is a vendor crude driver there will be many such 
changes, so if i can combine some changes together then atleast the number of 
patches can be kept low and also i thought of clubbing these changes together 
as Joe Perches once told me "Don't get carried away with patch type separation" 
(reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/1/2).

regards
sudip

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to