On 2015/3/7 3:27, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
  I have a very recent qemu i686 image, using a 3.19.0 kernel and
dhclient, which works fine if the host is running a 3.19.0 kernel,
but breaks when the host runs 4.0.0-rc1 or -rc2.

  On those, dhclient does not get an address, so I have no network.
There is a message
e1000 0000:00:03.0 eth0: Reset adaptor

  Before I start trying to bisect this, has anybody already seen, or
fixed, it ?

  Bisected.
b4eef9b36db461ca44832226fbca614db58c0c33 is the first bad commit
commit b4eef9b36db461ca44832226fbca614db58c0c33
Author: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.c...@intel.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 22 10:32:57 2014 +0100

     kvm: x86: vmx: NULL out hwapic_isr_update() in case of
!enable_apicv

     In most cases calling hwapic_isr_update(), we always check if
     kvm_apic_vid_enabled() == 1, but actually,
     kvm_apic_vid_enabled()
         -> kvm_x86_ops->vm_has_apicv()
             -> vmx_vm_has_apicv() or '0' in svm case
                 -> return enable_apicv && irqchip_in_kernel(kvm)

     So its a little cost to recall vmx_vm_has_apicv() inside
     hwapic_isr_update(), here just NULL out hwapic_isr_update() in
     case of !enable_apicv inside hardware_setup() then make all
     related stuffs follow this. Note we don't check this under that
     condition of irqchip_in_kernel() since we should make sure
     definitely any caller don't work  without in-kernel irqchip.

     Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.c...@intel.com>
     Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>

  I have reverted this from -rc2 (big offsets, 209 and 357 lines) and
everything is working again.


Did you try Linux 4.0-rc3? That includes one relevant fix,

KVM: SVM: fix interrupt injection (apic->isr_count always 0)

Thanks
Tiejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to