On NumaChip systems, the physical processor ID assignment wasn't accounting
for the number of nodes in AMD multi-module processors, giving an incorrect
sibling map:
$ cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/topology
$ grep . *
core_id:5
core_siblings:00000000,ff000000
core_siblings_list:24-31
physical_package_id:3
thread_siblings:00000000,30000000
thread_siblings_list:28-29
After fixing:
core_id:5
core_siblings:00000000,ffff0000
core_siblings_list:16-31
physical_package_id:1
thread_siblings:00000000,30000000
thread_siblings_list:28-29
Candidate for stable.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <dan...@numascale.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
index 19f893f..a59768b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
@@ -180,11 +180,15 @@ static int __init numachip_probe(void)
static void fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
{
-
- if (c->phys_proc_id != node) {
- c->phys_proc_id = node;
- per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node;
- }
+ u64 val;
+ u32 nodes;
+
+ per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node;
+
+ /* Account for nodes per socket in multi-core-module processors */
+ rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, val);
+ nodes = ((val >> 3) & 7) + 1;
+ c->phys_proc_id = node / nodes;
}
static int parse_oemn(struct acpi_table_header *table)
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
