On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 12:23 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PI is always good, cause it allows the tracking of what is high > > priority , and what is not . > > that's just plain wrong. PI might be good if one cares about priorities > and worst-case latencies, but most of the time the kernel is plain good > enough and we dont care. PI can also be pretty expensive. So in no way, > shape or form can PI be "always good".
I don't agree with that. But of course I'm always speaking from a real time perspective . PI is expensive , but it won't always be. However, no one is forcing PI on anyone, even if I think it's good .. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
