Hi Joe,

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 14:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:13:03 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> 
>> wrote:
>> > Add format specifiers for printing struct clk:
>> >   - '%pC' or '%pCn': name (Common Clock Framework) or address (legacy
>> >     clock framework) of the clock,
>> >   - '%pCr': rate of the clock.
> []
>> Seems a bit cruel to teeny systems which don't implement clock.  How does
>> this look?  Saves 160 bytes in each powerpc build!
>
> Does this still emit a pointer value for those systems?
> Glancing at it, does it just emit NULL?

Yes, there's a "return string(buf, end, NULL, spec);" at the end.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to