On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:47:23PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> since offline cpus will still show up to rendezvous ... perhaps
> "num_present_cpus()" is the right number??

Provided nmi_shootdown_cpus() code path clears offlined CPUs from
cpumasks so that num_present_cpus() or any other for that matter returns
the correct number, but I don't see it upon a quick grep...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to