On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:47:23PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > since offline cpus will still show up to rendezvous ... perhaps > "num_present_cpus()" is the right number??
Provided nmi_shootdown_cpus() code path clears offlined CPUs from cpumasks so that num_present_cpus() or any other for that matter returns the correct number, but I don't see it upon a quick grep... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/