On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 16:43 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 23.02.2015 um 04:06 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> > .. let's see how much, if anything, breaks due to the version number.
> > Probably less than during the 3.0 timeframe, but I can just imagine
> > somebody checking for meaningful versions.
> >
> > Because the people have spoken, and while most of it was complete
> > gibberish, numbers don't lie. People preferred 4.0, and 4.0 it shall
> > be. Unless somebody can come up with a good argument against it.
>
> The only argument that I can come up with is "we do not break userspace".
> For example there is this "gem" in configure.ac of valgrind:
>
>
> case "${kernel}" in
> 2.6.*|3.*)
> AC_MSG_RESULT([2.6.x/3.x family (${kernel})])
> AC_DEFINE([KERNEL_2_6], 1, [Define to 1 if you're using
> Linux 2.6.x or Linux 3.x])
> ;;
>
> 2.4.*)
> AC_MSG_RESULT([2.4 family (${kernel})])
> AC_DEFINE([KERNEL_2_4], 1, [Define to 1 if you're using
> Linux 2.4.x])
> ;;
>
> *)
> AC_MSG_RESULT([unsupported (${kernel})])
> AC_MSG_ERROR([Valgrind works on kernels 2.4, 2.6])
> ;;
Heh, if this is an argument, we have one hell of a lot of reverting to
do :) Crash for example breaks at much higher resolution, and indeed
just broke yet again. Tough titty for userspace methinks.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
