On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> John Stultz (1):
>       ntp: Fixup adjtimex freq validation on 32-bit systems

This is confusing. 32-bit?

> +       /*
> +        * Check for potential multiplication overflows that can
> +        * only happen on 64-bit systems:

64-bit?

> +       if ((txc->modes & ADJ_FREQUENCY) && (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)) {

Hmm. The code clearly says "&& (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)"

But:

> +               if (LLONG_MIN / PPM_SCALE > txc->freq)
>                         return -EINVAL;
> -               if (LONG_MAX / PPM_SCALE < txc->freq)
> +               if (LLONG_MAX / PPM_SCALE < txc->freq)
>                         return -EINVAL;

The difference between LONG_MAX and LLONG_MAX only matters if
BITS_PER_LONG would be 32.

So the changes are confusing to begin with and the commit log
description doesn't match them anyway.

I'm not pulling this without clarifications.

                           Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to