Borislav, Ingo,
On 02/19, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Is there consensus on the first 5 patches?
Yes, but perhaps you can also look at another series
[PATCH 1/3] x86, fpu: __kernel_fpu_begin() should clear fpu_owner_task
even if use_eager_fpu()
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142169357231860&w=2
[PATCH 2/3] x86, fpu: always allow FPU in interrupt if use_eager_fpu()
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142169359331866&w=2
[PATCH 3/3] x86, fpu: don't abuse FPU in kernel threads if
use_eager_fpu()
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142169360931869&w=2
? (off course I will be happy to resend)
It was sent before the recently applied changes. And in fact in theory
728e53fef429a0f "x86/fpu: Also check fpu_lazy_restore() when use_eager_fpu()"
depends on 1/3 above.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
