* Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com> wrote:
> > I suspect you're talking about something else entirely;
> > your changelogs are inadequate for they tell ntohing of
> > your usecase and have me guessing. Don't do that.
>
> Sorry. I did mention Intel PT in patch 2, but I basically
> assumed the need to synchronize events with other time
> sources was understood.
Written down, slightly repetitive walk-throughs from first
concepts to implementation that don't assume too much
context are very useful to us slightly overworked
maintainers with an attention span of a slightly retarded
golden retriever. (Make the story interesting and mix in a
few jokes and you've got our attention for sure!)
So please do explain verbosely, especially if a review
discussion turns somewhat discordant, it's a useful tool.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
