On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 14:52 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:44:48 -0800 Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > > > These functions are soon going to return void > > That's news to me.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/4/393 > > so remove the > > return value uses. > > > > Convert the return value to test seq_has_overflowed() instead. > > Why not make seq_printf() return seq_has_overflowed()? Unnecessary overhead. > I'm sure it's all very sensible, but the changelogging is poor. Perhaps > doing all this in a coherent patch series would be a better way. The changes span too many subsystems. These could just return 0 for the most part. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
