В Вт, 17/02/2015 в 12:26 +0100, Peter Zijlstra пишет:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:46:51PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > >
> > > Place it in sched.h, because dl_task_timer() needs it.
> > > Also remove lockdep check, which is not fit to this
> > > function.
> >
> > No, that lockdep check is valid for all current sites.
>
> Also, note that you just proved the reason we didn't have pi_lock there
> wrong the other day.
>
> As per 0f397f2c90ce ("sched/dl: Fix race in dl_task_timer()"):
>
> "The only reason we don't strictly need ->pi_lock now is because
> we're guaranteed to have p->state == TASK_RUNNING here and are
> thus free of ttwu races".
>
> And therefore we should use the full task_rq_lock() here.
>
So, we move task_rq_lock() to sched.h, and dl_task_timer() uses it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
