Lee,

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:48:08PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> 
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > @@ -840,6 +840,11 @@ config STMPE_SPI
> >       This is used to enable SPI interface of STMPE
> >  endmenu
> >  
> > +config MFD_BERLIN_CTRL
> > +   bool
> 
> Missing description.
> Why can't this driver be built as a module?

Well, this mfd driver registers various devices as the pinctrl and the
reset driver. I think we want the pinctrl driver to always be
registered.

IMHO we want this driver to always be selected when using a Berlin SoC.

> 
> > +   select MFD_CORE
> > +   select MFD_SYSCON
> 
> Missing help.
> 
> >  config MFD_STA2X11
> >     bool "STMicroelectronics STA2X11"
> >     depends on STA2X11
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > index 53467e211381..adf60e85df20 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > @@ -179,3 +179,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_DLN2)          += dln2.o
> >  
> >  intel-soc-pmic-objs                := intel_soc_pmic_core.o 
> > intel_soc_pmic_crc.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC)       += intel-soc-pmic.o
> > +
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_BERLIN_CTRL)      += berlin-ctrl.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/berlin-ctrl.c b/drivers/mfd/berlin-ctrl.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..e3ce6f069f16
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/berlin-ctrl.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2015 Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
> > + *
> > + * Antoine Tenart <antoine.ten...@free-electrons.com>
> 
> Author: Antoine Tenart <antoine.ten...@free-electrons.com>

Hmmm, okay.

> 
> > +
> > +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> 
> kernel.h?

Is there a reason to add this header here?

> > +/*
> > + * BG2 devices
> > + */
> > +static const struct mfd_cell berlin2_ctrl_chip_ctrl_subdevs[] = {
> > +   {
> > +           .name           = "berlin2-soc-pinctrl",
> > +           .of_compatible  = "marvell,berlin2-soc-pinctrl",
> > +   },
> > +   {
> > +           .name           = "berlin2-reset",
> > +           .of_compatible  = "marvell,berlin2-reset",
> > +   },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct mfd_cell berlin2_ctrl_system_ctrl_subdevs[] = {
> > +   {
> > +           .name           = "berlin2-system-pinctrl",
> > +           .of_compatible  = "marvell,berlin2-system-pinctrl",
> > +   },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct berlin_ctrl_priv berlin2_ctrl_chip_ctrl_data = {
> > +   .devs   = berlin2_ctrl_chip_ctrl_subdevs,
> > +   .ndevs  = ARRAY_SIZE(berlin2_ctrl_chip_ctrl_subdevs),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct berlin_ctrl_priv berlin2_ctrl_system_data = {
> > +   .devs   = berlin2_ctrl_system_ctrl_subdevs,
> > +   .ndevs  = ARRAY_SIZE(berlin2_ctrl_system_ctrl_subdevs),
> > +};
> > +
> > +
> 
> Superfluous '\n'

Sure.

> 
> > +
> > +static int berlin_ctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +   struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +   const struct of_device_id *match;
> > +   const struct berlin_ctrl_priv *priv;
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   match = of_match_node(berlin_ctrl_of_match, dev->of_node);
> > +   if (!match)
> > +           return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +   priv = match->data;
> > +
> > +   ret = mfd_add_devices(dev, 0, priv->devs, priv->ndevs, NULL, -1, NULL);
> > +   if (ret) {
> > +           dev_err(dev, "Failed to add devices: %d\n", ret);
> > +           return ret;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> 
> I'm not sure I see the point in this driver.  Why can't you just
> register these devices directly from DT?

All these devices share the same bank of registers and we previously
used a single node. But with many devices sharing a single node, this is
problematic to register all the devices from DT. Using this MFD driver
to do it is a proper solution in this case.

To provide a regmap to the devices' drivers we also use syscon on the
chip/system controller nodes.

> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 
> v2

"GPL" is a valid choice, quoting include/linux.module.h:

        "GPL"              [GNU Public License v2 or later]
        "GPL v2"           [GNU Public License v2]

Is there a reason you explicitly want to use GPLv2, and only GPLv2?

Antoine

-- 
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to