Linas Vepstas wrote:
Thus, one wouldn't want to perform an iochk_read() in this way unless
one was already pretty sure that an error had already occured ...

If another kind of I/O error detecting system finds a error before
performing iochk_read(), it can prevents coming iochk_read() from
spending such crazy cycles in have_error() by marking cookie->error.

>> int iochk_read(iocookie *cookie)
>>  {
>> +      if (cookie->error || have_error(cookie->dev))

Isn't it enough?

And as Ben said, it seems that ppc64 can have its own special iochk_*,
unless calling pci_read_config_word() ;-)

Thanks,
H.Seto

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to