On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 02:32:12PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:02:46PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 01:31:53PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > How about having it just record that it should parse the given property > > > when the table in the card is being handleed rather than overwrite that? > > > You mean adding another pair of dapm_routes with num_dapm_routes for > > Device Tree or something like that? > > That should work, I had been thinking of just recording where to parse > from and deferring the parse entirely.
Okay. I'll try both approaches and choose a comparatively neater one. Thanks Nicolin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
