On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 07:49:53PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > Like said, that will still recursive call delayacct_blkio_*() and would
> > increase nr_iowait for a second time; while arguably its still the same
> > one io-wait instance.
> 
> No it doesn't.  There is no "blk_flush_plug" call between the
> delayacct_blkio_*() calls.

Duh, clearly I needed to still wake up :/

> I've moved blk_flush_plug to the beginning of the function.

> I wondered if it really make sense to call blk_flush_plug with nr_iowait
> elevated and delayacct_blkio active.  blk_flush_plug() could call schedule()
> for non-"io" reasons and maybe that could upset stuff???

Yeah, good question that. Lemme ponder that a bit.

> I don't really know.  I'm happy with your version.  I don't suppose anyone
> else is paying attention and could give a third opinion....

:-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to