On 02/09/2015, 06:31 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> @@ -197,8 +197,25 @@ static int klp_find_verify_func_addr(struct klp_object 
> *obj,
>       else
>               ret = klp_verify_vmlinux_symbol(func->old_name,
>                                               func->old_addr);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
>  
> -     return ret;
> +     ret = kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(func->old_addr, &func->old_size,
> +                                       NULL);
> +     if (!ret) {
> +             pr_err("kallsyms lookup failed for '%s'\n", func->old_name);
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     ret = kallsyms_lookup_size_offset((unsigned long)func->new_func,
> +                                       &func->new_size, NULL);
> +     if (!ret) {
> +             pr_err("kallsyms lookup failed for '%s' replacement\n",
> +                    func->old_name);
> +             return -EINVAL;

EINVAL does not seem to be an appropriate return value for "not found".
Maybe ENOENT?

regards,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to