Hello Wendy,
Two things: your patch needs to be properly signed off on. Read
Documentation/SubmittingPatches for a description of what that entials.
Secondly, your patch adds whitespace on the end of the else. Aside
from that, the printk should be removed -- just replace it with the
ret = -ENOSYS.
Also, please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on future aio patches. Cheers,
-ben
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 03:06:52PM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> Previously sent via private mail that doesn't seem to go thru - resend
> via office mailer.
>
> Note that other than few exceptions, most of the current filesystem
> and/or drivers do not have aio cancel specifically defined
> (kiob->ki_cancel field is mostly NULL). However, sys_io_cancel system
> call universally sets return code to -EGAIN. This gives applications a
> wrong impression that this call is implemented but just never works. We
> have customer inquires about this issue.
>
> Upload a trivial patch to address this confusion.
>
> -- Wendy
>
>
> --- linux-2.6.12/fs/aio.c 2005-06-17 15:48:29.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux/fs/aio.c 2005-07-10 12:48:14.000000000 -0400
> @@ -1641,8 +1641,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_io_cancel(aio_contex
> cancel = kiocb->ki_cancel;
> kiocb->ki_users ++;
> kiocbSetCancelled(kiocb);
> - } else
> + } else
> cancel = NULL;
> +
> spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
>
> if (NULL != cancel) {
> @@ -1659,8 +1660,10 @@ asmlinkage long sys_io_cancel(aio_contex
> if (copy_to_user(result, &tmp, sizeof(tmp)))
> ret = -EFAULT;
> }
> - } else
> + } else {
> + ret = -ENOSYS;
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "iocb has no cancel operation\n");
> + }
>
> put_ioctx(ctx);
>
--
"Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once." -- John Wheeler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
