On Fri, Feb 06 2015, Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: > The functionality of strnstr() does not change with this patch, so it > does not need to address your concern.
Yeah, I should have checked that, of course. Sorry. > Feel free to submit a patch that states the difference of the kernel > version of strnstr with whatever version is out in the wild. It seems a much better name would be memstr, and "length-limited string" is misleading, since s1 is in no way treated as a string. But I'll leave it for now. Rasmus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
