On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 05:07:43PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:44:24 +0000
> Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> > The point is that by now this strlen() is the only thing for which we
> > NUL-termination of the substring; moving it inside the filter_parse_regex()
> > is an obviously equivalent transformation and it leaves that one strlen() 
> > call
> > inside filter_parse_regex() the only place where we still care about NUL.
> > 
> > The next commit kills it off completely, at which point we are done with
> > modifying the string at all.
> 
> Thanks for the explanation,
> 
> Can you add that to the change log. I like to think patches can stand
> on their own, and if they are added to help another patch, it should be
> stated in the change log so someone doing a git blame followed by a git
> show, knows what is going on.

Done and force-pushed.  Do you want me to repost the whole thing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to