From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:21:21 +0100
The cpufreq_cooling_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL
and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index fde97d6..bab67db 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -320,8 +320,7 @@ static int cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
- if (priv->cdev)
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(priv->cdev);
+ cpufreq_cooling_unregister(priv->cdev);
dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(priv->cpu_dev, &policy->freq_table);
of_free_opp_table(priv->cpu_dev);
clk_put(policy->clk);
--
2.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
