On 2015-01-29 15:34, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On 29/01/15 13:35, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2015-01-29 14:15, Michal Marek wrote: >>> On 2015-01-29 07:46, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> --- a/Makefile >>>> +++ b/Makefile >>>> @@ -1179,7 +1179,8 @@ MRPROPER_FILES += .config .config.old .version >>>> .old_version $(version_h) \ >>>> Module.symvers tags TAGS cscope* GPATH GTAGS GRTAGS GSYMS \ >>>> signing_key.priv signing_key.x509 x509.genkey \ >>>> extra_certificates signing_key.x509.keyid \ >>>> - signing_key.x509.signer vmlinux-gdb.py >>>> + signing_key.x509.signer vmlinux-gdb.py \ >>>> + scripts/gdb/linux/*.py[co] >>> >>> In 01/28, you already have >>> >>> +clean-files := *.pyc $(if $(KBUILD_SRC),*.py) >>> >>> Maybe just add *.pyo there and you don't need to add it to the toplevel >>> Makefile. >> >> Based on a quick test, you seem right. Daniel, anything we miss? > > No. Deleting it with the clean rule makes sense. > > Of course the .gitignore parts of my patch will still be needed in some > form or other.
Sure. Can you provide an updated version, one that augments the clean-files rule instead? Then I'll sign-off and include it in a potential follow-up round. Thanks, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
