This makes negligible difference in practice: but swap_list.next should not
be updated to a higher prio in the general helper swap_info_get, but rather
in swap_entry_free; and then only in the case when entry is actually freed.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 mm/swapfile.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- swap6/mm/swapfile.c 2005-07-08 19:14:26.000000000 +0100
+++ swap7/mm/swapfile.c 2005-07-08 19:14:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ static struct swap_info_struct * swap_in
        if (!p->swap_map[offset])
                goto bad_free;
        swap_list_lock();
-       if (p->prio > swap_info[swap_list.next].prio)
-               swap_list.next = type;
        swap_device_lock(p);
        return p;
 
@@ -251,6 +249,8 @@ static int swap_entry_free(struct swap_i
                                p->lowest_bit = offset;
                        if (offset > p->highest_bit)
                                p->highest_bit = offset;
+                       if (p->prio > swap_info[swap_list.next].prio)
+                               swap_list.next = p - swap_info;
                        nr_swap_pages++;
                        p->inuse_pages--;
                }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to