Because the at91_xxx_standby function is removed, remove the struct ramc_ids .data members code.
Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.y...@atmel.com> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com> --- arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 19 ++++--------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c index 4c18428..b8dba9f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c @@ -362,10 +362,10 @@ void __init at91_ioremap_matrix(u32 base_addr) } static struct of_device_id ramc_ids[] = { - { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-sdramc", .data = at91rm9200_standby }, - { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-sdramc", .data = at91sam9_sdram_standby }, - { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-ddramc", .data = at91_ddr_standby }, - { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-ddramc", .data = at91_ddr_standby }, + { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-sdramc" }, + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-sdramc" }, + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-ddramc" }, + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-ddramc" }, { /*sentinel*/ } }; @@ -374,28 +374,17 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void) struct device_node *np; const struct of_device_id *of_id; int idx = 0; - const void *standby = NULL; for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, ramc_ids, &of_id) { at91_ramc_base[idx] = of_iomap(np, 0); if (!at91_ramc_base[idx]) panic(pr_fmt("unable to map ramc[%d] cpu registers\n"), idx); - if (!standby) - standby = of_id->data; - idx++; } if (!idx) panic(pr_fmt("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n")); - - if (!standby) { - pr_warn("ramc no standby function available\n"); - return; - } - - at91_pm_set_standby(standby); } void __init at91_dt_initialize(void) -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/