On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:04:53PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.greg...@linaro.org> > > If the early boot methods of acpi are happy that we have valid ACPI > tables and acpi=force has been passed, then do not unflat devicetree > effectively disabling further hardware probing from DT. > > Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com> > Tested-by: Yijing Wang <wangyij...@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.greg...@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun....@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c > index 4580ed3..5d139e1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c > @@ -411,7 +411,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > efi_idmap_init(); > early_ioremap_reset(); > > - unflatten_device_tree(); > + if (acpi_disabled) > + unflatten_device_tree();
Nitpick: you could actually squash this patch into the previous one to keep the acpi disable/enable logic in one place. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
