Hi.
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:08, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 7/6/05, Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > diff -ruNp
> > 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-old/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
> > 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-new/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
> > --- 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-old/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
> > 2005-06-20 11:46:50.000000000 +1000
> > +++ 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-new/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
> > 2005-07-04 23:14:18.000000000 +1000
> > @@ -68,6 +68,17 @@ acpi_system_write_sleep (
> > goto Done;
> > }
> > state = simple_strtoul(str, NULL, 0);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND2
> > + /*
> > + * I used to put this after the CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
> > + * test, but people who compile in suspend2 usually want
> > + * to use it instead of swsusp. --NC
> > + */
> > + if (state == 4) {
>
> enum for states instead of magics, please.
Changed to ACPI_STATE_S4. Thanks!
Nigel
--
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
