In case we request a number of SMP blocks which is lower than
the already reserved blocks, we should not try to allocate a
negative number, but 0 blocks instead.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Viau <sv...@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_smp.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_smp.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_smp.c
index bf55188..1f795af89 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_smp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_smp.c
@@ -119,9 +119,10 @@ static int smp_request_block(struct mdp5_smp *smp,
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&smp->state_lock, flags);
 
-       nblks -= reserved;
-       if (reserved)
+       if (reserved) {
+               nblks = max(0, nblks - reserved);
                DBG("%d MMBs allocated (%d reserved)", nblks, reserved);
+       }
 
        avail = cnt - bitmap_weight(smp->state, cnt);
        if (nblks > avail) {
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.

The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a 
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to