On 01/15/2015 02:19 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:44 -0800, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> On 01/15/2015 09:23 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>>> The commit 3b8a3c010969 ("powerpc/pseries: Fix endiannes issue in RTAS
>>> call from xmon") was fixing an endianness issue in the call made from
>>> xmon to RTAS.
>>>
>>> However, as Michael Ellerman noticed, this fix was not complete, the
>>> token value was not byte swapped. This lead to call an unexpected and
>>> most of the time unexisting RTAS function, which is silently ignored
>>> by RTAS.
>>
>> Nit. Not so much that is silently ignored by RTAS as much as
>> disable_surveillance silently doesn't check the return status of the
>> RTAS call. Maybe a check is warranted and reporting of non-success.
>
> Yeah you're right, I added a printf of the result and got -3, which is also
> wrong as far as I can tell, but I didn't have the energy to chase it any
> further.
If this was on a powerkvm guest set-indicator should be present for
hotplug (DLPAR) support. However, the surveillance indicator would not
be implemented. I know sometimes I forget if I'm on a powervm or
powerkvm guest. Just a thought.
-Tyrel
>
> Because this is in xmon we want to be extra careful about what we do, but an
> xmon_printf() should be safe. I'll do that as a cleanup after this.
>
> cheers
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
