On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Debabrata Banerjee <dbane...@akamai.com> wrote:
>
> Comment in tcp_cwnd_restart() was referencing the wrong RFC for the algorithm
> it's implementing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbane...@akamai.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index 65caf8b..0c13f88 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static __u16 tcp_advertise_mss(struct sock *sk)
> return (__u16)mss;
> }
>
> -/* RFC2861. Reset CWND after idle period longer RTO to "restart window".
> +/* RFC2581 4.1. Reset CWND after idle period longer RTO to "restart window".
> * This is the first part of cwnd validation mechanism. */
> static void tcp_cwnd_restart(struct sock *sk, const struct dst_entry *dst)
> {
RFC2861 resets the cwnd like in RFC2581, but the rest of the code
implements RFC2861. So I think the current comment is fine.
>
> --
> 2.2.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
