>>> On 13.01.15 at 14:29, <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > Em Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:48:35AM +0000, Jan Beulich escreveu: >> Arnaldo, >> >> considering that tools/include/ gets used by other than just perf, in >> particular arch/x86/vdso/vdso2c.c, would you mind clarifying how >> "tools: Move bitops.h from tools/perf/util to tools/" adding an >> inclusion of asm/hweight.h to linux/bitops.h is supposed to work, >> when the only potentially relevant header to be found is >> tools/perf/util/include/asm/hweight.h? > > Oops, includes are tricky, even more so when trying to reuse the kernel > ones in tools/, so we need to go on addressing these problems, thanks > for reporting. > > Please take a look if the patch at the end addresses this problem, I > think it should at least disentangle what is in tools/include from what > is in tools/perf/.
It looks like it would fix the issue - thanks for the quick response. Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
