On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:53:01AM +0000, Prabhakar Lad wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ti.com> > wrote: > > On 08/01/15 10:17, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > >> this patch checks the return value of write command while > >> setting the display offset. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c > >> b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c > >> index 70e3ce8..a7ecaa6 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c > >> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c > >> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int ssd1307fb_ssd1306_init(struct ssd1307fb_par > >> *par) > >> > >> /* set display offset value */ > >> ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, SSD1307FB_SET_DISPLAY_OFFSET); > >> - ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20); > >> + ret = ret & ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20); > >> if (ret < 0) > >> return ret; > > > > Hrm, what's that supposed to do? If both calls to ssd1307fb_write_cmd() > > return an error, they are anded, resulting in a garbage error code... > > > Agreed I have just aligned this to rest of the code in this function. > > Maxime if you are OK I'll post a patch returning error then and there ?
I'm not sure what the question is, but Tomi is right, having two returns seems the right thing to do. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
