Le 11/01/2015 22:12, Olof Johansson a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:02:50AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Le 08/01/2015 23:41, Olof Johansson a écrit : >>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 12:14:37PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin, >>>> >>>> This is the rebase of my previous pull-request on top of 3.19-rc1. As said >>>> at >>>> the time of my early messages, I was waiting for the arm-soc *and* pinctrl >>>> material to reach Linus T.'s tree before sending this pull-request. In fact >>>> this sequence was needed for the gpio header removal. The little patch >>>> about >>>> #include deletion just follows an earlier merge conflict in arm-soc tree: >>>> I was >>>> also waiting for this moment before sending the definitive fix, just to be >>>> sure. >>>> >>>> In comparison with the previous pull-request, I also added a tiny >>>> correction of >>>> the sama5d4.dtsi timer entry. All the rest is pretty straightforward. >>>> >>>> Thanks, best regards, >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit >>>> 97bf6af1f928216fd6c5a66e8a57bfa95a659672: >>>> >>>> Linux 3.19-rc1 (2014-12-20 17:08:50 -0800) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nferre/linux-at91.git >>>> tags/at91-fixes >>>> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 0e049c66ebf56a415cadd6c593b7ee0a2cb9d19d: >>>> >>>> ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix the timer reg length (2015-01-05 11:07:14 >>>> +0100) >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> First fixes batch for AT91 on 3.19 folowing The big cleanup: >>>> - removal of unused Kconfig RTC options >>>> - GPIO header file is now in same directory as the pinctrl driver >>>> - little fix on #includes >>>> - removal of DEBUG_LL from the sama5 common defconfig >>>> - little fix of reg size in sama5d4.dtsi >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Bo Shen (1): >>>> ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix the timer reg length >>> >>> This is the only fix among these patches, isn't it? The others seem to >>> be code removals/cleanups better targeted for 3.20, as far as I can tell. >> >> Well, this is why I sent the first version of this pull-request very >> early in the process. I didn't have the possibility to re-send it >> earlier on top of -rc1 until this pull-request. >> >> For me, the remaining of a dead Kconfig option, some issues with >> DEGUG_LL and to a lesser extend the remaining of dead code are worth >> cleaning now. I do have more cleanup patches to come in 3.20, but >> waiting more for this simple material to be included is IMHO not >> necessary... >> >> I may have some more fixes remaining for 3.19 and will be cautious about >> their nature. > > I'm a bit confused -- I said this branch isn't actually a fixes branch so we > can't merge it for 3.19, but there is _one_ patch from it that looks like it > should go in. > > It's not really about whether the material is simple or not -- all maintainers > need to keep focus on only sending up fixes during the -rc series. Sometimes > we > pick up a cleanup or two for -rc2 or so, but the time for that for 3.19 is > past > us. > > Since you mention that you have more fixes coming (why hold off on them?), do > you want me to cherry-pick over that one fix to our fixes branch, or can you > queue it with the other fixes when you send them up?
Fair enough, I build a new "at91: fixes for 3.19 #1 (ter)" with tree more patches right now. Thanks, bye. -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
